Submit an Article
Navigate
Home
Editorial Board
Editorial Policies
Current Volume
Archive
Scientific Integrity
Publication Ethics Statements
Interviews with Outstanding Authors
Newsroom
Sponsored Conferences
Podcast
Contact
Special Collections
Submit an Article
Online ISSN: 1945-4589
Research Paper
|
Volume 13, Issue 5
|
pp. 6936–6944
Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated image-guided volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a phase II randomized trial from China
Back to article
Figure 3
(3 of 3)
−
100%
+
Figure 3.
bRFS outcome in patients treated with hypofractionated IG-VMAT versus conventionally fractionated IG-VMAT.
bRFS, biochemical relapse–free survival; IG, imaging-guided; volumetric-modulated arc therapy, VMAT.